Millions of peoples’ lives have been improved using this effective tool of the mind, whether it’s someone you personally know or celebrities such as Ellen DeGeneres, Matt Damon, Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie, sports players, Olympic contenders, and the list goes on.
Achieving a trance state is a natural ability of the mind, and a hypnosis practitioner is a person who has learned the skills to direct you into a trance state necessary to complete your goals and guide you through a healing process to affect positive changes. Still, not all hypnosis practitioners are created equal. A hypnotic trance state is completely safe when practiced and performed by a Certified and experienced professional.
As you know finding the best practitioner is critical. The answers to the following questions will determine the level of expertise and if she/he is the best practitioner for your needs..
When you ask these questions, you will be insuring the success of your sessions, and you will experience the positive changes you desire.
1.) Is the hypnosis professional trained for a minimum of 60 hours and certified?
A well-trained and experienced hypnosis practitioner will be Certified by one of the three prominent certifying organizations, The National Guild of Hypnotists (NGH), The National Board for Certified Clinical Hypnotherapists (NBCCH), and The American Society of ClinicalHypnosis (ASCH). An active member in-good-standing will provide you with a copy of her/his up-to-date annual certificate if you desire and it will be displayed prominently in his/her office.
For the best results, accept no substitutes.
Many hypnosis practitioners get their initial training (some as few as 12 hours) and stop there. Highly regarded hypnosis practitioners obtain 60 initial hours of training and attend national conventions to obtain specialty certificates of completion on a regular basis to guarantee you the most effective, modern process. Evidence of continuing education is significant.
2.) Can you verify the hypnosis practitioner is insured?
Hypnosis is a natural ability of the mind, but it is also a skill and endeavor. The professional hypnotist will be insured with a liability policy. The amateur will not typically make the investment to protect him/herself or you.
You can rest assured that well-trained professionals have liability insurance coverage for your protection.
3.) Does the hypnosis practitioner perform individual sessions face-to-face, via webcam or phone?
The experienced hypnosis practitioner knows that the most effective method is a one-on-one session versus a group session of dozens or hundreds. It’s true, some people can have temporary success with a recorded or group session, but the success rate is short-lived and exponentially more effective when the process is custom-designed to your needs.
Be cautious of the practitioner who invites you to their office and only has you listen to a CD with headphones. Why bother when you could have done that at home?
4.) Does the practitioner offer a Free Confidential Consultation?
The choice to work with a hypnosis practitioner needs to be made with confidence; for that reason, highly effective hypnosis practitioners offer a Free 15 or 20-Minute Free Confidential Phone or webcam Consultation.
During the consultation, she/he will help you identify your goals and custom-design the best program for your success. You will learn about hypnosis and become comfortable with the hypnosis process. She/he will answer any questions you may have.
If you find her/his profile is deficient in any of these areas, it is a red flag she/he is a poorly trained, and there may be cause for concern.
The answers these questions will help you select a highly trained person. You will be more relaxed knowing you are obtaining the services of a well-educated and experienced professional.
What’s the next step? Using the key words to do an Internet search. Certified Hypnosis Practitioner and the issue you wish to resolve. Such as: Depression, Certified Hypnosis Practitioner.
This brief analyzes Medicaid enrollment and spending trends for FY 2020 and FY 2021 based on data provided by state Medicaid directors as part of the 20th annual survey of Medicaid directors in states across the country and the District of Columbia. After relatively flat enrollment growth in FY 2020, states responding to the survey expect Medicaid enrollment to jump in FY 2021, attributed to the Families First Coronavirus Response Act “maintenance of eligibility” (MOE) requirements and to the economic downturn that started late in FY 2020. Across all reporting states, states were anticipating that total Medicaid spending growth would accelerate in FY 2021 compared to FY 2020. Enrollment was the primary factor identified as putting upward pressure on expenditure growth in FY 2021.
The Survey on Race and Health, a joint project between KFF and ESPN’s The Undefeated, explores the public’s views and experiences on the topics of health care, racial discrimination, and the coronavirus pandemic, with a special focus on Black adults, a group that has borne a disproportionate burden of COVID-19 cases and deaths. This survey of 1,769 U.S. adults includes an oversample of 777 Black Americans to allow for in-depth reporting among this group, as well as comparison groups of White and Hispanic adults. This project focuses on African Americans’ views and experiences of being Black in America, including views of unconscious bias and structural racism; experiences of discrimination within and outside of health care settings; trust in the health care system; the social and economic impacts of the pandemic; and views of a potential coronavirus vaccine.
The coronavirus pandemic, social distancing, and resulting economic downturn have had considerable implications for the U.S. health system, including health insurers. The pandemic caused a sizable decrease in the use of health care services during the first half of 2020, job losses appear to have led to coverage loss in the employer market and increases in Medicaid enrollment, and insurers projecting costs for next year must assess the relative effects of pent-up demand for delayed care, the continuing pandemic, and a potential vaccine.
In this brief, we analyze data from 2013 to 2020 to examine how insurance markets performed through the first half of this year as the pandemic developed and worsened in the U.S. We use financial data reported by insurance companies to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners and compiled by Mark Farrah Associates to look at average medical loss ratios and gross margins in the individual (also known as non-group), fully-insured group (employer), and Medicare Advantage health insurance markets. A more detailed description of each market is included in the Appendix.
We find that, as of the end of June 2020, average margins have increased and loss ratios have dropped across the fully-insured group and Medicare Advantage markets, relative to the same time period in 2019. If administrative costs were roughly the same in 2020 as in 2019, these findings suggest higher profits for many insurers during the pandemic. Individual market loss ratios were already quite low and remained flat into 2020, suggesting continued profitability. The results for the individual and group markets indicate that commercial insurers are on track to owe substantial rebates to consumers again next year under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medical Loss Ratio provision.
One way to assess insurer financial performance is to examine average gross margins per member per month, or the average amount by which premium income exceeds claims costs per enrollee in a given month. Gross margins are an indicator of performance, but positive margins do not necessarily translate into profitability since they do not account for administrative expenses. However, a sharp increase in margins from one year to the next, without a commensurate increase in administrative costs, would indicate that these health insurance markets have become more profitable during the pandemic.
Despite many insurers covering the full cost of coronavirus testing and treatment for their enrollees, insurers across most markets have seen their claims costs fall, and margins increase since the start of the pandemic, and relative to 2019. This is consistent with the sharp drop in utilization documented in other analyses.
Gross margins among group market plans increased 22% (or $20 pmpm) through the second quarter of 2020 relative to the same period in 2019. Gross margins among Medicare Advantage plans also increased, rising 41% (or $64 pmpm) through the first six months of 2020 compared to gross margins at the same point last year. (Gross margins per member per month tend to be higher for Medicare Advantage than for the other health insurance markets mainly because Medicare covers an older, sicker population with higher average costs). Prior to the pandemic, margins in the group and Medicare Advantage markets had grown gradually over recent years.
Figure 1: Average Gross Margins Per Member Per Month Through June, 2013 – 2020
Individual market margins have been more volatile than the other private markets since the early years of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), as described in more depth in our earlier analyses of individual market financial performance. Individual market margins remained relatively stable through the first six months of 2020, decreasing just $4 per member per month, and remaining much higher than in the earlier years of the ACA. These data suggest that insurers in the individual market remain financially healthy after a year and a half with no individual mandate penalty, even while the coronavirus outbreak worsened.
Medical Loss Ratios
Another way to assess insurer financial performance is to look at medical loss ratios, which are the percent of premium income that insurers pay out in the form of medical claims. Generally, lower medical loss ratios mean that insurers have more income remaining, after paying medical costs, to use for administrative costs or keep as profits. Each health insurance market has different administrative needs and costs, so low loss ratios in one market do not necessarily mean that market is more profitable than another market. However, in a given market, if administrative costs hold mostly constant from one year to the next, a drop in loss ratios would imply that plans are becoming more profitable.
Medical loss ratios are used in state and federal insurance regulation in a variety of ways. In the commercial insurance (individual and group) markets, insurers must issue rebates to individuals and businesses if their loss ratios fail to reach minimum standards set by the ACA. Medicare Advantage insurers are required to report loss ratios at the contract level; they are also required to issue rebates to the federal government if they fall short of 85%, and are subject to additional penalties if they fail to meet loss ratio requirements for multiple consecutive years in a row.
The loss ratios shown in this issue brief differ from the definition of MLR in the ACA, which makes some adjustments for quality improvement and taxes, and do not account for reinsurance, risk corridors, or risk adjustment payments. The chart below shows simple medical loss ratios, or the share of premium income that insurers pay out in claims, without any modifications (Figure 2). Loss ratios in the Medicare Advantage market decreased 5 percentage points through the first six months of 2020 relative to the same period in 2019, and group market loss ratios decreased by an average of 3 percentage points relative to last year.
Figure 2: Average Medical Loss Ratios Through June, 2013 – 2020
The individual market was the only market in which average loss ratios held steady from last year. Even so, loss ratios in the individual market were already quite low and insurers in that market are issuing record-large rebates to consumers based in part on their 2019 experience.
Although we cannot measure profits directly, all signs suggest that health insurers in most markets have become more profitable so far during the pandemic. Medicare Advantage and group health plans saw rising margins and falling loss ratios through June 2020, relative to the same time last year. In contrast, margins and loss ratios among individual market insurers have generally remained flat through the second quarter compared to the same time last year, though insurers in this market already had high margins and low loss ratios last year.
That insurers appear to be becoming more profitable during a pandemic may be counter-intuitive. Insurers were generally required to cover COVID-19 testing costs, and many also voluntarily covered the full cost of COVID-19 treatment for a period of time (see for example, announcements from UnitedHealthcare, CVSHealth (Aetna), and Cigna). Even with these increased pandemic-related expenses, though, many insurers saw claims costs fall as enrollees delayed or went without other types of health care due to social distancing restrictions, cancelation of elective procedures, or out of fear of contracting the virus. Job losses and economic instability may also affect health care utilization.
The drop in utilization that has contributed to higher gross margins and lower medical loss ratios presents uncertainty and challenges for insurers, particularly given the unknown trajectory of the pandemic. For Medicare Advantage insurers, these trends may result in plans offering more benefits than they currently do, which are popular and attract enrollees. But if insurers fall short in meeting required loss ratio requirements for multiple years, they face additional penalties, including the possibility of being terminated. In the individual and group markets, insurers are reporting pandemic-related uncertainty as they set premiums for next year, and insurers are making different assumptions about the extent to which utilization will rebound or health costs will change due to factors like the potential for widespread vaccination.
Unless these patterns change substantially in late 2020, ACA medical loss ratio rebates in 2021 likely will be exceptionally large across commercial markets. Rebates to consumers are calculated using a three-year average of medical loss ratios, meaning that 2021 rebates will be based on insurer performance in 2018, 2019, and 2020. In the individual market in particular, insurers were quite profitable in 2018 and 2019, so even if 2020 turns out to be a more average year, these insurers will likely owe large rebates to consumers. Group market insurers may also owe larger rebates to employers and employees than plans have in typical years, as loss ratios have dropped substantially. This may, in part, explain why many commercial insurers have volunteered to cover COVID-19 treatment costs, waived telemedicine cost-sharing, or expanded mental health services during the pandemic. By increasing their claims costs, insurers can proactively increase loss ratios and owe smaller rebates next year.
Guardian Australia brings together all the latest on active and daily new Covid-19 cases, as well as maps, stats, live data and state by state graphs from NSW, Victoria, Queensland, SA, WA, Tasmania, ACT and NT to get a broad picture of the Australian outbreak and track the impact of government response
Due to the difference in reporting times between states, territories and the federal government, it can be difficult to get a current picture of how many confirmed cases of coronavirus there are in Australia.
Here, we’ve brought together all the figures in one place, along with comparisons with other countries.
Switzerland makes masks mandatory as continent struggles to contain infections
Police fought anti-mask protesters in the Czech Republic, Ireland prepared to announce tough new restrictions and Switzerland made masks mandatory indoors as European governments struggled to contain continuing record Covid case numbers.
As Italy on Sunday reported 11,705 new infections over the past 24 hours, its largest ever figure, and France on Saturday set a new high of 32,427 cases, police in Prague’s historic tourist district fired teargas and water cannon after demonstrations against strict anti-coronavirus restrictions turned violent.
Chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat in hospital; Switzerland to introduce more measures on Monday; nine French cities face month of restrictions – follow live
Healthcare workers and high-risk populations will be prioritised for vaccination against the coronavirus in New York when a candidate is approved, governor Andrew Cuomo said on Sunday.
He announced details of a preliminary five-stage vaccine rollout plan – here’s a summary:
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on Sunday reported 53,157 new coronavirus cases, taking the total to 8,081,489. The number of deaths has risen by 593 to 218,511, the health protection agency said.
The CDC figures do not necessarily reflect cases reported by individual states.
Exclusive: researchers believe increase in single Britons not fully leaving home till their 30s is here to stay
The so-called “boomerang” phenomenon – young adults returning to their parents’ home until well into their 20s or early 30s – is now a permanent feature of UK society and likely to trigger a profound rethink of how many families live their lives, experts have said.
Research found nearly two-thirds of childless single adults aged 20-34 in the UK have either never left or have moved back into the family home because of a combination of a precarious job market and low wages, sky-high private sector rents and life shocks such as relationship breakups.
Jobs set to go at world’s oldest toyshop’s Regent Street store and nearby head office
The toy retailer Hamleys is shedding more than a quarter of its workforce in London as the health crisis prompts shoppers to shun the capital’s world-famous shopping district.
Founded in 1760, Hamleys is the world’s oldest toyshop, with its store on Regent Street a magnet for international tourists in normal times. But the absence of foreign holidaymakers and tightening local restrictions, which mean the number of office workers is once again dwindling, is devastating trade in the area.
Population growth of 600,000 fewer people in 2022 a sign of major changes for all aspects of everyday life, Deloitte reports
The pandemic has created Australia’s “sliding doors” moment with the nation now facing a smaller and older population shift, forever altering the future that may have been.
The decision to shut Australia’s borders, made out of necessity to prevent Covid-19 spreading, has pulled the country into a new reality where lower rates of population growth will affect everything from the number of schools states build to the rate of infrastructure investment, economic consultancy Deloitte Access Economics has found.
New modelling indicates mandatory masks and strict closures of public spaces early in the state’s second wave could have eradicated the virus
Elimination of Covid-19 has been found to have been achievable in Victoria within six weeks had the state gone into stage-four lockdown with mandatory wearing of masks – but without curfews or 5km travel restrictions – immediately from 9 July, when there were 860 active cases of the virus in the state.
The modelling analysis published in the Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) on Monday also says it was a missed opportunity that “an expert advisory group on elimination was not convened, limiting the capacity for an optimal evidence-informed policy response”.